Source: University of Minnesota Extension
Alfredo DiCostanzo, Extension animal scientist and Hugh Chester-Jones, professor, College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resource Sciences
You can use alternative feeds such as corn gluten feed, distillers byproducts or small grains to improve cost of gain.
Evaluate alternative feeds to optimize feed use and cost.
Always process small grains but avoid excess processing as it will reduce feed efficiency.
High moisture feeds improve intake but may not improve daily gain.
Two measures drive feedlot profitability:
Average daily gain (ADG).
Relates to the days on feed.
Mainly affects nonfeed cost of gain.
Dry matter (DM) needed per pound of gain.
Relates more closely to feed cost of gain.
Using alternative feeds
Types of alternative feeds
Corn gluten feed
Corn gluten feed (CGF) comes from corn milling for starch, germ meal and sugar production. CGF consists mainly of corn bran, which includes:
Added steep liquor
Together these create a high protein and fiber feedstuff. But since CGF fiber digests quickly, the energy value is better than expected.
CGF in corn silage diets
Studies show that wet or dry CGF fed at 20 to 50 percent diet DM in corn silage-based diets has a similar energy value to corn silage. An 8 percent increase in DM needed per pound of gain resulted when dry CGF replaced corn silage (80 percent diet DM) in some cases. But the price of dry CGF relative to corn silage could reduce cost of gain.
CGF and corn grain
In finishing diets, the value of wet or dry CGF approaches that of corn grain when CGF makes up to 50 percent of the diet DM. Adding over 50 percent of diet DM of dry CGF increases DM needed per pound of gain. But the price of dry CGF relative to corn grain may reduce the cost of gain.
CGF and corn silage in high corn grain diets
DM needed per pound of gain increased from 3 to 16 percent over the control diet when
Feeding dry CGF at 30 percent with 15 percent corn silage
Feeding wet CGF at 50 or 70 percent with 10 percent corn silage
This may be a bad effect from fiber digestion of CGF and corn silage in the presence of corn grain. Thus feeding wet or dry CGF with corn silage may reduce efficiency.
Distillers byproducts include fiber, protein and lipid fractions from corn milling in ethanol production. Most studies with dry or wet distillers byproducts show they have an energy value equal to or greater than corn grain.
Increasing wet distiller byproduct in the diet reduces DM needed per pound of gain as much as 17 percent. Steers that ate more wet distiller byproduct ate less dry matter but gained more weight than those fed a corn grain diet. Based on these results, Klopfenstein and Stock 1983 show that the energy value of wet distiller byproduct is about 0.97 Mega calories per pound of DM.
Klopfenstein and Stock 1993 looked at dry distillers byproduct diets (40 percent of diet DM) with a range in fiber nitrogen between 9.7 and 28.8 percent of crude protein. They found that the DM required per pound of gain was 8 to 10 percent less than the control diet.
Dry matter required per pound of gain for a wet distiller byproduct diet (40 percent diet DM) fed was 16 percent less than the control diet. Thus the energy value of the distiller byproduct is higher than corn despite energy loss during the drying process.
Sound and moldy small grains
You may replace corn with small grains in finishing diets. Wheat and barley have like energy to corn but they ferment faster than corn in the rumen. Thus, you need to consider cost and proper feeding when using small grains.
Dry rolled barley has similar feed efficiency as corn grain. But steers fed barley gained 5 to 7 percent less weight and ate 4 to 6 percent less feed daily than steers fed corn grain. While barley lowers the feed cost of gain, you must compare the added time in the feedlot to the cost of feed savings.
Increasing dry rolled wheat from 15 to 45 percent of diet DM had alike feed efficiencies to corn. But steers gained 2 to 6 percent less weight than steers fed corn grain. You must consider added time in the feedlot when figuring reduced cost of gain from wheat.
Low priced wheat or barley may contain the toxin vomitoxin. University of Minnesota studies show that vomitoxin amounts as high as 21 parts per million doesn’t affect feed efficiency. Thus, you may see added reduced feed cost of gain when you use low cost vomitoxin-contaminated wheat or barley.
Evaluating alternative feeds
Feedlot operators need to be able to decide whether or not to use alternative feed sources. They also need to know how storing and processing affect feed cost of gain. Consider the following before using an alternative.
Cost including processing and handling.
Desired amount to feed.
Possible changes in feed DM needed per pound of gain.
Dry matter content.
Worksheet 1 will help you optimize feed use and storage or processing methods. It can help you compute the break-even point for an alternative diet. You can use the worksheet to:
Decide whether it pays to roll corn.
Compute the expected cost of gain is for a lower quality feed you must use.
Compute alternative feed prices you need for profit.
You must enter the following data into the worksheet:
How much you feed daily in the current diet.
Cost of feed ingredients including processing or handling costs.
Dry matter content of feed ingredients: measure often enough to for a good feed intake estimate.
Projected or observed ADG.
Processing and storing methods impact feed efficiency
Most Midwest feedlots must decide how to store grain or whether to process them. Feedlots may need to use high moisture grains because of weather or facilities. Feedlots may need to grind or roll grain due to feedlot size, facility design or feed delivery method.
Always process small grains to allow for proper digestion in the rumen. Excess grain processing reduces feed efficiency.
Rolling may be enough.
Grinding barley resulted in a 4.6 percent increase in DM required per pound of gain.
This resulted from increased feed intake without an increase in daily gain.
There isn’t a general trend for corn.
In most cases, feed efficiency doesn’t differ more than 5 percent. Thus, prices and ease of feeding drives the decision to roll or crack corn.
Using high moisture feeds generally improves feed intake. But there must be a like increase in daily gain to prevent increasing DM required per pound of gain. High moisture may reduce feed efficiency of small grains that quickly ferment.
High moisture rolled barley in place of dry increased DM needed per pound of gain 7 to 24 percent. In both cases, feed intake increase but daily gain decrease or stayed the same.
Replacing dry rolled or cracked corn with high moisture shelled or rolled corn doesn’t affect, or tended to improve feed efficiency.
Moisture may improve corn’s slower fermentation rate.
Feedlot operators in the Upper Midwest may use this method because of short growing seasons, possible reduced harvest costs or both.
Anderson, P.T., D.P. O’Connor, M.T. Lewis, and B.J. Johnson. 1992. Inclusion of wheat in typical Minnesota feedlot diets. MN Beef Cattle Res. Rep. B-389. Brink, D.R., O.A. Turgeon, Jr., D.L. Harmon, R.T. Steele, T.L. Mader, and R.A. Britton. 1984. Effects of additional limestone of various types on feedlot performance of beef cattle fed high corn diets differing in processing method and potassium level. J. Anim. Sci. 59:791.
Dexheimer, C.E., J.C. Meiske, and R.D. Goodrich. 1971. Comparison of ensiled high moisture and artificially dried shelled corn for finishing yearling steers. B-158.
DiCostanzo, A., L. Johnston, H. Chester-Jones, J.C. Meiske, M. Murphy, R. Epley, and L. Felice. 1995. Effects of feeding vomitoxin-contaminated barley on performance of feedlot steers. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-418.
DiCostanzo, A., L. Johnston, and M. Murphy. 1994. Feeding vomitoxin and mold-contaminated grains to cattle. In: Proc. 55th MN Nutr. Conf. and Roche Tech. Symp. Sept 19-21, Bloomington, pp 193-216.
DiCostanzo, A., H. Chester-Jones, S.D. Plegge, T. M. Peters, and J.C. Meiske. 1990. Energy value of maize gluten feed in starter, growing or finishing steer diets. Anim. Prod. 51:75.
Firkins, J.L., L.L. Berger, and G.C. Fahey, Jr. 1985. Evaluation of wet and dry distillers grains and wet and dry corn gluten feeds for ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 60:847.
Gharib, F.H., R.D. Goodrich, J.C. Meiske, and H.A. Cloud. 1971. Comparison of corn stored at 11.5% moisture or 16.1% moisture in a steel bin with aeration. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-160.
Hanke, H.E., R.E. Smith, R.D. Goodrich, and J.C. Meiske. 1981. Type of corn (dry corn vs. high-moisture corn grain) and nitrogen supplement (urea vs. soybean meal) for yearling steers. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-271.
Hanson, S., S.D. Plegge, and J.C. Meiske. 1984. Influence of feeding whole or rolled corn to Holstein steers. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-320.
Kennelly, J.J., G.W. Mathison, and G. de Boer. 1988. Influence of high-moisture barley on the performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:811.
Klopfenstein, T.J. and R.A. Stock. 1993. Feeding wet distillers and gluten feed to ruminants. In: Proc. 54th MN Nutr. Conf. and National Renderers Symp. Sept 20-22, Bloomington, pp 53-61.
Malone, D., D.B. Faulkner, G.F. Cmarik, R. Johnson, and D.F. Parrett. 1986. Factors influencing the feeding value of whole shelled corn. IL Beef Cattle Res. Rep. 53-54.
Miller, K.P., E.C. Frederick, J.C. Meiske, and R.D. Goodrich. 1971. Performance of Holstein steers fed corn stored and processed by three methods. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-159.
Poppert, G.L. and T.L. Mader. 1989. Roughage source and corn processing for step-up and finishing diets. NE Beef Cattle Rep. MP 54, pp 43-44.
Windels, H.F., A. DiCostanzo, M. Murphy, and R.D. Goodrich. 1995. Effect of deoxynivalenol from barley on performance and health of large frame crossbred steers. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B417.
Windels, H.F., B.W. Woodward, J.C. Meiske and R.D. Goodrich. 1994. The effect of combined use of trenbolone acetate and estradiol implants on response of large-frame crossbred steers to dietary energy sources. MN Cattle Feeders Rep. B-410.
Windels, H.F., R.D. Goodrich, and J. C. Meiske. 1976. Comparison of corn or barley, corn silage or alfalfa haylage + corn silage and housing systems for growing finishing cattle. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-220.
Windels, H.F., R.D. Goodrich, and J.C. Meiske. 1974. Comparison of housing systems and dry or high moisture barley for feedlot cattle. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-198.
Windels, H.F., J.C. Meiske, and R.D. Goodrich. 1970. Dry rolled vs. ground barley for finishing cattle. MN Cattle Feeder Rep. B-147.